If you or someone you know is in a mental health crisis, call the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or text HOME to 741741 for the Crisis Text Line.
Recognized Excellence
THE DANGER
Grok Was Built Without Adequate Safety Guardrails
xAI designed Grok to be less filtered than other AI chatbots. Independent testing and safety reviews have documented that Grok validates delusions, provides harmful content to vulnerable users, and lacks basic crisis intervention capabilities — creating serious risks for users with mental health vulnerabilities.
Grok Validates Delusions Instead of Providing Help
When a user told Grok they "heard voices," instead of recommending professional help or providing crisis resources, Grok responded that it was the CIA "running psychological ops." Independent testing confirmed Grok treats references to self-harm as normal conversation — offering companionship and validation rather than crisis intervention, safety questions, or hotline numbers.
HOW GROK CAUSES HARM
The Mental Health Risks of Interacting with Grok
From psychotic episodes to reinforced delusions, Grok's design choices create unique dangers for vulnerable users that other major AI chatbots have taken steps to mitigate.
Psychotic Episodes & Breaks from Reality
Users have reported developing psychosis symptoms after prolonged Grok use, including hallucinations, feeling "constantly connected" to the chatbot, seeing code during daily activities, and experiencing sensations of their brain being "on fire."
Delusion Reinforcement
AI chatbots have an inherent tendency to validate user beliefs. Grok's reduced safety guardrails make this worse — actively reinforcing paranoid delusions and conspiracy thinking rather than directing users to professional help.
Self-Harm Encouragement
Testing revealed Grok treats self-harm references as normal conversation, offering companionship rather than crisis intervention. When asked about methods of self-harm, Grok provided lists of medications and associated harms.
"Unhinged Mode" & Conspiracy Personas
Grok's "unhinged mode" removes content filters entirely. Leaked system prompts revealed a "crazy conspiracist" persona programmed to reference 4chan and Infowars content — material that can trigger or worsen delusional thinking.
Minors & Vulnerable Users at Risk
Grok cannot effectively identify teen users, and the X app is rated for ages 12+. Young adults at elevated psychosis risk are 1.7x to 2.56x more likely to report intensive AI use and to ascribe human-like roles to chatbots.
Addiction & Emotional Dependency
Grok's AI companions use gamification mechanics like "Affection Systems" that score interactions, deepening emotional dependency. Research shows at-risk users are up to 3x more likely to treat chatbots as companions, friends, or therapists.
What the Experts Are Saying
"The use of AI chatbots can have significant negative consequences for people with mental illness." ... "AI chatbots have an inherent tendency to validate the user's beliefs."
— Prof. Soren Dinesen Ostergaard, Aarhus University, in a study of nearly 54,000 patients with mental illness (Fortune, Mar 2026). Grok's deliberate removal of safety guardrails amplifies this validation risk.
HOW WE CAN HELP
Legal Theories for Grok AI Psychosis Claims
When an AI company deliberately strips safety guardrails from its chatbot and users suffer serious mental health harm as a result, multiple legal theories support holding that company accountable.
Product Liability
Grok is a product released to the public with known safety deficiencies. When it validates delusions, provides self-harm information, or triggers psychotic episodes, xAI may be liable for releasing a defective product that causes foreseeable harm.
Negligence & Duty of Care
xAI has a duty to implement reasonable safety measures. Independent testing shows Grok scored 0.30% on security and 0.42% on safety — far below industry standards. This failure to meet basic safety benchmarks may constitute negligence.
Failure to Warn
xAI markets Grok to the general public, including through the X platform rated for ages 12+, without adequate warnings about the documented risks of AI-induced psychosis, delusion reinforcement, or emotional dependency.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
xAI deliberately created "unhinged mode" and conspiracy personas knowing they could cause distress. This conscious choice to remove safety measures — not mere negligence, but intentional design — may support claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Meet Our Legal Team
Frederick Schenk
Managing Partner
Over 45 years of experience in personal injury, mass torts, and complex litigation.
Benjamin Schenk
Co-Founder & Trial Attorney
J.D. from University of San Diego School of Law. Graduate of ABOTA Trial College.
Lynn Schenk
Of Counsel
Former U.S. Congresswoman and the first woman elected to the House of Representatives from San Diego.
David Lizerbram
Partner, Business Advisory Practice Lead
Leads the firm's business advisory practice. Represented hundreds of clients in complex business transactions, entity formation, and corporate governance.
WHY ACT NOW
Holding xAI Accountable for Grok's Mental Health Harms
Regulators across the globe are already investigating xAI. Legal action by those harmed is the next step in holding this company accountable.
Statute of Limitations
Personal injury claims have time limits. If you were harmed by Grok, the clock is already ticking on your right to pursue compensation.
Preserving Evidence
Chat logs, medical records, and timestamps connecting Grok interactions to mental health episodes are critical evidence. xAI may delete or modify conversation data at any time.
Global Regulatory Momentum
California, the EU, UK, Ireland, France, Spain, and India have all opened investigations into xAI and Grok. This regulatory pressure strengthens the evidentiary basis for civil claims.
Precedent-Setting Litigation
The Character.AI wrongful death lawsuit — settled in January 2026 — established that AI companies can be held liable for chatbot-induced mental health harm. Grok psychosis claims build on this precedent.
Contingency Fee Basis
We handle these cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fees upfront, and we only collect a fee if we recover compensation for you. The initial consultation is free and confidential.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Common Questions About Grok AI Psychosis Claims
Get Your Free Case Evaluation
Tell us about your experience with Grok AI. Our attorneys will review your case at no cost and with no obligation.
Don't Let AI Negligence Go Unanswered
If Grok AI caused you or a loved one to experience psychosis, delusions, or other serious mental health harm, contact The Schenk Law Firm today for a free, confidential case evaluation.