More than 40 million people ask ChatGPT health questions every day, by OpenAI’s own count. A peer-reviewed study found that ChatGPT Health under-triaged more than half of the emergencies it was tested on, steering patients with conditions like impending respiratory failure and diabetic ketoacidosis away from the emergency room. If you or a loved one was harmed after relying on ChatGPT Health, our attorneys can review your case.
Source: Nature Medicine, Ramaswamy et al., Feb. 2026
52%
Of emergency cases under-triaged by ChatGPT Health in a structured test
Call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room now if you are having a medical emergency.
You asked ChatGPT or ChatGPT Health about symptoms and it told you to wait or book a routine appointment.
You delayed going to the emergency room or seeing a doctor because of what it told you.
Your condition got worse, or you were hospitalized, after that delay.
ChatGPT failed to point you to crisis help when you described thoughts of self-harm.
A family member died after relying on ChatGPT for medical advice.
Recognized Excellence
The Danger
OpenAI launched ChatGPT Health in January 2026, letting U.S. users connect their medical records and get AI-generated health advice. The first independent safety test, published in Nature Medicine, found the tool often played down serious emergencies. A University College London researcher called the results “unbelievably dangerous.”
84%
Of attempts in which ChatGPT Health sent a suffocating patient to a future appointment instead of emergency care
Source: The Guardian, Feb. 26, 2026
12x
More likely to downplay symptoms when a friend in the scenario said it was nothing serious
Source: The Guardian, Feb. 26, 2026
0 of 16
Times the suicide crisis banner appeared once normal lab results were added to the same patient’s message
Source: The Guardian, Feb. 26, 2026
A Pattern of Under-Triage
In the study, ChatGPT Health directed patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or impending respiratory failure to a 24 to 48 hour evaluation instead of the emergency department. It handled classic emergencies like stroke well.
Who Is at Risk
From missed emergencies to unreliable crisis alerts, flawed AI health advice can cause serious harm.
ChatGPT Health under-triaged 52% of emergency cases, telling some patients with life-threatening conditions to wait 24 to 48 hours instead of going to the ER.
A researcher who reviewed the study said a patient with respiratory failure or diabetic ketoacidosis had about a 50/50 chance of being told it wasn’t urgent.
Crisis messages appeared more often when a patient described no specific method of self-harm than when the patient did.
In one test, adding normal lab results to the same message made the suicide help banner disappear in all 16 attempts.
Experts warn that a confident, reassuring answer can lead people to stay home during an asthma attack or diabetic crisis.
In an Oxford study of nearly 1,300 adults, people using AI chatbots identified the relevant condition in fewer than 35% of cases, no better than people using their usual sources.
Sources: Nature Medicine, Ramaswamy et al., Feb. 2026 · The Guardian, Feb. 26, 2026 · NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Feb. 2026
“If you’re experiencing respiratory failure or diabetic ketoacidosis, you have a 50/50 chance of this AI telling you it’s not a big deal.”
Alex Ruani, doctoral researcher in health misinformation mitigation, University College London, via, The Guardian, Feb. 26, 2026
How We Help
When an AI health tool gives dangerously inaccurate advice that leads to injury, the company behind it may be held liable. We review these claims under several legal theories.
ChatGPT Health is a product marketed for health decisions. When it gives defective advice, like telling a patient in respiratory failure to wait 48 hours, OpenAI may be liable for a defective product.
A company that builds a tool to read patient medical records and give health recommendations may owe its users a duty of care. Failing to make that tool meet basic medical safety standards may be negligence.
OpenAI’s disclaimers may not be enough given a design that invites people to rely on its health advice. The gap between how the product is marketed and how reliable it is can support a failure-to-warn claim.
Marketing an AI tool as a health advisor while independent testing shows it under-triages more than half of emergencies may violate state consumer protection laws against unfair or deceptive practices.
In October 2026, our firm filed Wan v. OpenAI, Inc., et al. in San Francisco Superior Court on behalf of the parents of Bowen Wan, a 31-year-old software engineer. The complaint alleges that ChatGPT wrote the schedule that took her off her prescribed anti-seizure medication and that she died as a result. The New York Times reported on the filing. The complaint and our press materials are at schenklawfirm.com/press/wan.
We handle these cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fees upfront, and we only collect a fee if we recover compensation for you. The initial consultation is free and confidential.
Managing Partner
Over 45 years of experience in personal injury, mass torts, and complex litigation.
Co-Founder & Trial Attorney
J.D. from University of San Diego School of Law. Graduate of ABOTA Trial College.
Of Counsel
Former U.S. Congresswoman and the first woman elected to the House of Representatives from San Diego.
Partner, Head of Business Advisory
Leads the firm’s business advisory practice. Represented hundreds of clients in complex business transactions, entity formation, and corporate governance.
Why Act Now
AI health tools now reach tens of millions of people. Legal accountability is one way to make them safer.
Personal injury claims have time limits.
Chat logs, medical records, and timestamps that connect the AI’s advice to your medical decisions are key evidence. Save them now.
Peer-reviewed studies now document ChatGPT Health’s triage failures.
If a loved one died after relying on ChatGPT for medical advice, family members may have a wrongful death claim.
We handle these cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fees upfront, and we only collect a fee if we recover compensation for you. The initial consultation is free and confidential.
These cases ask how product liability and negligence law apply to AI health tools.
If ChatGPT Health gave you or a loved one medical advice that led to harm, we’ll review your case at no cost and explain your legal options.
Frequently Asked Questions
Tell us what you asked ChatGPT, what it told you, and what happened next. Our attorneys will review your case at no cost and with no obligation.
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
AI Harm
Claims for people harmed after AI chatbot conversations fed delusions or a mental health crisis.
Learn More →AI Harm
Claims for people whose mental health was harmed after conversations with Grok.
Learn More →AI Harm
Claims for people targeted by non-consensual AI-generated images made with Grok.
Learn More →
If ChatGPT Health gave you or a loved one dangerous medical advice, contact The Schenk Law Firm for a free, confidential case evaluation.